Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on clinical and physiological outcomes in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and identify key treatment moderators. Design: Following PRISMA 2020, six databases were searched through December 2025. The primary outcome was pain; secondary outcomes were grip strength, median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA), sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) and sensory distal latency (SDL). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses examined regimens, emission modes, and session numbers. Results: Sixteen randomized controlled trials were analyzed. LLLT significantly reduced pain (Hedges’ g =-1.524, P <0.001) and improved grip strength (Hedges’ g =0.391, P =0.002). Pulsed mode was superior for analgesia, whereas continuous mode better supported grip strength. SNCV improved significantly (Hedges’ g =0.377, P =0.016), with benefits primarily associated with LLLT used adjunctively with active conservative treatment (ACT) or delivered in pulsed mode; CSA reduction was not significant overall ( P =0.064) and was significant only in the ACT subgroup. Meta-regression identified session number and wavelength as significant moderators for certain outcomes. Conclusion: LLLT effectively manages CTS, with parameter-dependent outcomes. Pulsed mode enhances analgesia, whereas continuous mode favors functional recovery. Protocols should tailor laser parameters to therapeutic targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: