Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As society explores new computing applications, data centers have seen a sharp rise in capacity and energy use, driving up data centers’ carbon footprint and raising concerns about their sustainability. In response, efforts to reduce emissions now complement the traditional goals of cutting energy costs and boosting performance. Given the spatiotemporal variability of the grid carbon intensity, researchers are increasingly adopting workload shifting strategies to minimize the operational carbon footprint of cloud workloads. However, shifting from cost- and performance-centric operations to carbon-aware operations introduces performance penalties and cost overheads. Moreover, large-scale spatial and temporal shifts can cause stampede effects, with synchronized migration to the same low-carbon regions or times, thereby straining resources and creating imbalances. In this paper, we quantify the carbon-cost-performance trade-offs of carbon-aware scheduling and evaluate the risk of such stampede effects. We provide real-world examples illustrating these tradeoffs for application and cloud providers. Lastly, we offer practical insights to help mitigate these challenges and guide sustainable scheduling decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanafy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: