Why the study?
The effects of plant sterol supplementation on inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress in adults with overweight or class I–III obesity and mild hypercholesterolemia needed evaluation.
Comparison
Plant sterol 2 g/day vs placebo
Design
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial
Follow-up
8 weeks per treatment period separated by a 6-week wash-out
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized double-blind crossover trial finds plant sterol supplementation does not alter inflammatory or oxidative biomarkers in overweight adults, suggesting limited vascular benefits.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of plant sterol (PS) supplementation on inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress in subjects with overweight/class I–III obesity and mild hypercholesterolemia. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Twenty-three subjects received 2 g/day of PS or placebo for 8 weeks, separated by a 6-week wash-out. LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was the primary outcome of the trial; all other parameters, which are the main focus of this article, were secondary and exploratory outcomes. Results: PS supplementation increased serum β-sitosterol (+1.21 µg/mL [95% CI 0.70, 1.72]) and its cholesterol-normalized ratio (+0.60 µmol/mmol [0.35, 0.85]), the only outcomes that retained significance after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Campesterol showed a nominal increase (+0.72 µg/mL [0.10, 1.35]) that did not retain significance after FDR correction, whereas cholesterol synthesis markers (desmosterol and lathosterol) showed no statistically significant treatment effect. No statistically significant treatment effect was detected on LDL-C (−3.19 mg/dL [−15.91, 9.53]) or total cholesterol (−1.79 mg/dL [−14.39, 10.81]). No inflammatory, endothelial dysfunction or oxidative stress biomarker showed a statistically significant treatment effect after FDR correction, VCAM-1 being the only parameter with a nominal treatment effect (+59.08 ng/mL [7.14, 111.02]). Cholesterol-normalized ratios of four cholesterol oxidation products (COPs) decreased within the PS arm but not versus placebo. Inverse Pearson correlations of PS absorption markers with IL-1β, IL-12p70 and ICAM-1 (r = −0.56 to −0.49) were not reproduced by Spearman analysis and did not retain significance after FDR correction. No clear correlation was found between serum PS and oxidative stress markers. Conclusions: PS supplementation increased circulating β-sitosterol concentrations, but no statistically significant effects were detected on LDL-C or the measured inflammatory, endothelial dysfunction, or oxidative stress biomarkers. Larger studies are needed to clarify the effects of PS supplementation on these outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Musto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: