Why the study?
Although revascularization restores blood flow, myocardial structure and function often remain incompletely recovered because reperfusion causes additional tissue damage through oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. This review summarizes recent advances in the mechanistic understanding of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and evaluates emerging therapeutic strategies.
Design
Narrative review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel targeted strategies for ischemia-reperfusion injury should not yet enter practice; leaves open their clinical efficacy pending prospective trials.
Myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury (MI/RI) is a common complication of cardiovascular disease management. Although revascularization strategies, including percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting, can restore blood flow, myocardial structure and function often remain incompletely recovered. Reperfusion can also cause additional tissue damage. This paradoxical exacerbation is largely attributable to oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. In this narrative review, we summarize recent advances in the mechanistic understanding of myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury and evaluate emerging therapeutic strategies. These approaches hold considerable promise and may provide novel preclinical evidence and clinical translation insights for improving prevention and management of reperfusion injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: