Key result
Higher home exercise regularity is linked to ~51% lower major cardiovascular events risk in CHD patients.
Why the study?
Does higher regularity of unsupervised home-based aerobic exercise reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with angiographically confirmed coronary heart disease?
Cohort (n=486)
No
Does higher regularity of unsupervised home-based aerobic exercise reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with angiographically confirmed coronary heart disease?
Greater consistency in unsupervised home-based aerobic exercise is associated with a graded reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events and improved LVEF among patients with coronary heart disease, supporting home exercise as a viable secondary prevention strategy when center-based rehabilitation is not utilized.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports hypothesis of benefit from home exercise regularity in CHD; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials before practice change.
Home-based exercise is increasingly recognized as an alternative to center-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), yet the association between different levels of home exercise regularity and cardiovascular outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 486 patients with angiographically confirmed CHD discharged between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients were classified into 4 EAR groups (inactive, low, moderate, and high regularity). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), comprising cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned coronary revascularization. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs); sensitivity analyses used cohort quartiles and continuous exercise adherence rate (EAR). Over a median follow-up of 71.2 months, 78 patients (16.0%) experienced MACE. Crude MACE incidence ranged from 22.58% in the inactive group to 9.82% in the high-regularity group. In the adjusted 4-group analysis, P for trend was 0.039, and the high-regularity group had an HR of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.24-1.03) versus the inactive group. Quartile-based analysis also showed a trend ( P for trend = 0.048), and each 10-percentage-point increase in EAR was associated with an adjusted HR of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.99). Among 423 patients with follow-up echocardiography, LVEF change differed across groups ( P < 0.001), ranging from + 0.77 ± 3.62 to + 5.89 ± 4.08 percentage points. Higher home exercise regularity was associated with a graded decrease in observed MACE risk among CHD patients. Given the observational design, these findings do not establish a causal protective effect or a clinical EAR threshold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=486). High home exercise regularity (EAR ≥70%) vs. Inactive home exercise (EAR <10%) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned coronary revascularization) (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-1.03, p=0.061 (0.039 for trend)). Higher home exercise regularity was associated with a graded decrease in major cardiovascular events risk in CHD patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: