Key result
MitraClip MTEER in non-COAPT-like SMR is linked to ~74% fewer heart failure hospitalizations.
Why the study?
Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is approved for secondary mitral regurgitation and heart failure based on COAPT eligibility criteria, but outcomes in patients beyond COAPT criteria with more advanced heart disease remain unclear.
Cohort (n=2,205)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MTEER yielded comparable 1-year outcomes in selected non-COAPT-like patients; leaves open whether eligibility should expand pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MTEER) is approved for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) and heart failure based on COAPT (The Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy) eligibility criteria. Outcomes in patients beyond COAPT criteria with more advanced heart disease remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of MTEER in SMR patients beyond COAPT trial criteria from the global, post-market EXPANDed studies. METHODS: Analyses were performed with the EXPANDed data set, including 2,205 patients treated with the 3rd/4th-generation MitraClip MTEER System. Non-COAPT-like patients were classified by baseline ≥3+ SMR and at least 1 of the following: left ventricular ejection fraction <20%, left ventricular end-systolic diameter >70 mm, or systolic pulmonary artery pressure >70 mm Hg. Echocardiographic outcomes were assessed by an echocardiographic core laboratory. RESULTS: ; 0.36). One-year mortality and HFH rates were similar between groups and comparable or lower to those in the MITRA-FR (Multicentre Study of Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair MitraClip Device in Patients with Severe Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) and COAPT trials. HFH was reduced by 56% in COAPT-like and 74% in non-COAPT-like patients from pre- to post-MTEER. At 1 year, both groups achieved significant MR reduction (90% MR ≤1+ COAPT-like and non-COAPT-like). CONCLUSIONS: In the EXPANDed studies, non-COAPT-like patients experienced significant improvements in MR, HFH, and quality-of-life at 1 year, comparable with those observed in COAPT-like patients. These findings suggest that MTEER may be an effective therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients outside COAPT eligibility. (The MitraClip EXPAND Study of the Next Generation of MitraClip Devices [EXPAND]; NCT03502811) (MitraClip EXPAND G4 Study [EXPAND G4]; NCT04177394).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) and heart failure (n=2,205). 3rd/4th-generation MitraClip MTEER in non-COAPT-like SMR patients vs. 3rd/4th-generation MitraClip MTEER in COAPT-like SMR patients was evaluated on 1-year MR reduction to ≤1+ and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) reduction from pre- to post-MTEER. MitraClip MTEER in non-COAPT-like SMR patients achieved 90% MR ≤1+ at 1 year and a 74% reduction in heart failure hospitalization.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: