Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a complete, computed design study of a fusion power plant based on a large conventional tokamak: a large-aspect-ratio tokamak of the class studied for power plants since the 1990s, with a full superconducting magnet set. The fuel is catalysed deuterium, releasing an effective 12 MeV per initial deuterium pair once the tritium and helium-3 products are burned in place. Heating is by neutral-beam injection with ion cyclotron minority heating, and the blanket concept is self-cooled lithium blanket that also serves as the tritium and helium-3 collection medium. Sizing follows from a zero-dimensional energy balance evaluated in the accompanying computation: fusion power 53.14 MW, auxiliary heating 110 MW, plasma gain Q 0.4831, neutron power 20.19 MW, first-wall neutron loading 0.02273 MW per square metre, gross electric output 63.47 MW, recirculating power 193.2 MW and net electric output -129.8 MW. Radiated bremsstrahlung removes 41.04 MW and transport removes 886.8 MW, against alpha-particle self-heating of 23.91 MW. The plant verdict on the stated assumptions is net negative. Where a quantity depends on an assumption that experiments have not yet demonstrated at the required value, that dependence is stated numerically so that the design can be re-scored as measurements improve. This study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement, and no part of the plant has been built. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: