Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a complete, computed design study of a fusion power plant based on a field-reversed configuration: a compact torus in which the plasma current reverses the externally applied field, creating closed field lines inside a separatrix. The fuel is deuterium helium-3, releasing 18.3 MeV per reaction released almost entirely in charged particles. Heating is by tangential neutral-beam injection that both heats and sustains the reversed field, and the blanket concept is low-activation silicon-carbide structure with a thin lithium layer for the residual deuterium side-reaction neutrons. Sizing follows from a zero-dimensional energy balance evaluated in the accompanying computation: fusion power 187.1 MW, auxiliary heating 80 MW, plasma gain Q 2.338, neutron power 7.483 MW, first-wall neutron loading 0.06266 MW per square metre, gross electric output 147.6 MW, recirculating power 149.9 MW and net electric output -2.257 MW. Radiated bremsstrahlung removes 7.568 MW and transport removes 1310 MW, against alpha-particle self-heating of 187.1 MW. The plant verdict on the stated assumptions is net negative. Where a quantity depends on an assumption that experiments have not yet demonstrated at the required value, that dependence is stated numerically so that the design can be re-scored as measurements improve. This study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement, and no part of the plant has been built. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: