Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a complete, computed design study of a fusion power plant based on a polywell cusp device: a cubic arrangement of six ring coils whose fields form point and line cusps around a field-free centre. The fuel is catalysed deuterium, releasing an effective 12 MeV per initial deuterium pair once the tritium and helium-3 products are burned in place. Heating is by electron beam injection maintaining a negative potential well that electrostatically confines ions in a high-beta cusp field, and the blanket concept is water-cooled lithium shield sized for the deuterium deuterium neutron flux, without a breeding requirement. Sizing follows from a zero-dimensional energy balance evaluated in the accompanying computation: fusion power 0.4128 MW, auxiliary heating 95 MW, plasma gain Q 0.00434, neutron power 0.1569 MW, first-wall neutron loading 0.00162 MW per square metre, gross electric output 35.23 MW, recirculating power 167.3 MW and net electric output -132.1 MW. Radiated bremsstrahlung removes 0.21 MW and transport removes 637.8 MW, against alpha-particle self-heating of 0.1857 MW. The plant verdict on the stated assumptions is net negative. Where a quantity depends on an assumption that experiments have not yet demonstrated at the required value, that dependence is stated numerically so that the design can be re-scored as measurements improve. This study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement, and no part of the plant has been built. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: