Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Parasitoid wasps are important biological control agents, but their small size and subtle morphological differences hinder rapid identification and require taxonomic expertise. This study developed a computer vision framework for recognizing parasitoid wasps from single-plane microscopy images. A dataset of 3420 images representing 36 parasitoid taxa and 38 terminal biological classes was assembled. Five YOLO detector generations and six CNN- and ViT-based classifiers were evaluated across three dataset sizes. YOLO11m was selected for further optimization. The optimized model integrated multiscale feature processing, attention mechanisms, a modified bounding-box regression loss, and tuned training settings. On an independent set, the baseline YOLO11m achieved an mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.867 at 640 × 640 pixels. At 960 × 960 pixels under untuned settings, YOLO11m and YOLO11m-opt achieved 0.873 and 0.917, respectively. After applying the selected training configuration, YOLO11m-opt achieved a precision of 0.985, recall of 0.989, mAP@0.5 of 0.995, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.933 across all 105 detection labels. Eigen-CAM visualizations showed spatial feature activations overlapping with potentially informative morphological structures. A Windows application supported batch analysis, offering a basis for computer-assisted specimen screening under laboratory conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: