Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While Mezirow’s foundational model frames transformative learning as a primarily epistemic process of shifting meaning perspectives through critical reflection, subsequent critiques have highlighted the need to expand this theory. This paper explores how Meister Eckhart’s works can serve as a dialogical resource for a more ontological understanding of transformation. Drawing on a selective reading of four Eckhartian concepts, the paper interprets transformative learning as a process of relational becoming marked by non-possessiveness, release, surrender, receptivity, and openness. It challenges instrumentalist and performative tendencies that seek to control, produce or measure inner changes. By reframing inner transformation as an emergent, ontological process, this paper proposes a pedagogy of release. Engaging Eckhart in dialogue enables transformative learning theory to foreground depth, hiddenness, and unpredictability, shifting the focus from perspective change to transformation of being in relation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karen Buttigieg (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: