At the core of every theory of transformative learning lies a fundamental epistemological question: how should learners decide what and whom to trust when established ways of knowing no longer suffice? Theories of transformative learning are therefore theories of knowledge as well as theories of change. This paper systematizes the various and often conflicting epistemological commitments within transformative learning (TL) literature. Epistemic resources are categorized into three broad domains: internal, interactive, and external. Internal resources encompass rational inquiry and extrarational processes, including engagement with the Unconscious, pre-structural sensations, and experiences interpreted as divine revelation. Interactive resources include dialogue, ecological engagement, and relational recognition. External resources include testimony from experts, sacred texts and traditions, and prior analytic frameworks used to organize and interpret evidence. The paper concludes with a provocation concerning epistemic responsibility and wisdom: openness to what different resources may disclose, precision about what they can warrant, attention to how their claims can be corrected, and responsibility toward those affected when transformed understandings become grounds for action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoggan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: