Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences between Streptosporangium sandarakinum GW-12028 T and Streptosporangium nondiastaticum IFO 13990 T revealed a sequence similarity of 98.8%. The genus Streptosporangium includes 33 species with validly published names. The type strains S. sandarakinum GW-12028 T (=DSM 45763 T =LMG 27062 T ) and S. nondiastaticum IFO 13990 T (=ATCC 27101 T =DSM 43848 T =JCM 3114 T =KCTC 9434 T =NBRC 13990 T =VKM Ac-1299 T ) were both isolated from soil. Whole-genome data were used to clarify the taxonomic assignment of these two closely related Streptosporangium species. Overall genomic relatedness index analyses indicated that S. sandarakinum GW-12028 T and S. nondiastaticum IFO 13990 T shared average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values >95% and >70%, respectively, exceeding the thresholds for bacterial species delineation. Additionally, S. sandarakinum GW-12028 T and S. nondiastaticum IFO 13990 T displayed near-identical phenotypic and chemotaxonomic profiles. Based on the 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic tree and the core-genome phylogenomic trees, S. sandarakinum GW-12028 T and S. nondiastaticum IFO 13990 T phylogenetically form a separate, tight cluster apart from other Streptosporangium species. Based on this combined evidence, S. sandarakinum Kämpfer et al . 2013 is proposed as a later heterotypic synonym of S. nondiastaticum Nonomura and Ohara 1969.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: