Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Long-term motion records from aids-to-navigation buoys combine nonstationary environmental responses, mooring-state variations, and positioning errors. These components are difficult to separate when tension measurements and damage labels are unavailable. Methods We propose field-residual-preserving environment-conditioned paired-difference learning. The method first estimates the predictable horizontal response from forward-aligned wind, wave, current, and attitude variables. It then adds controlled response differences to the same measured record and uses matched random-forest models to infer an equivalent response coefficient, a trajectory reference-center offset, and future statistical reference-radius exceedance probabilities. Results During the retrospective later-period evaluation, the random-forest environmental model reduced vector NRMSE by 41.58 % ± 0.13 % relative to a two-dimensional mean baseline. The complete M2 method achieved a joint NMAE of 0.2659 ± 0.0002 , with a paired improvement of 0.0126 (95% interval: [0.0074, 0.0173]) over M0. The reference-center offset vector MAE decreased by approximately 0.371 m, which represents controlled-parameter recovery accuracy. M2-Ridge retained comparable later-period performance, while a causal three-point median filter reduced the 5 m GPS perturbation ratio from 1.273 to 1.154 at the cost of a higher 6h Brier score. Discussion The method establishes a controlled scenario parameter recovery framework for nonstationary buoy observations. Its outputs are limited to equivalent response scaling, trajectory reference-center translation, and statistical reference-radius exceedance within the prescribed scenarios; they do not validate physical damage detection, anchor movement diagnosis, or maintenance decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: