Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Climate change can jointly alter electricity demand and generation availability, yet these effects are often assessed separately. This study develops an audit-controlled climate-conditioned electricity adequacy framework for Pakistan by linking an FY2025 hourly climate–demand model, ERA5-Land and GFDL-ESM4 SSP3-7.0 climate information, a geolocated generation inventory, and monthly supply–demand accounting for 2031–2050. The selected physical demand model, H0_no_heating, uses a 20 ∘C cooling threshold, hour-specific cooling sensitivity, humidity, calendar controls, and six-hour thermal memory. Its leave-one-month-out diagnostics are RMSE = 1392.4 MW, MAE = 1057.9 MW, and R2=0.8725. Under the 19,986 MW central-ready quantified supply basis and a climate-only demand counterfactual, 41 of 240 months exhibit negative monthly mean-balance margins, all during June–August. July 2044 is most constrained, with supply of 18,385.5 MW, mean demand of 19,678.8 MW, and a −1293.2 MW margin. A separate 31,179 MW sensitivity asset set remains non-deficit in monthly mean balance across 12 deterministic hydro/non-hydro states. These states have no probability weights. The framework therefore provides a reproducible monthly climate stress test, not an hourly probabilistic reliability assessment, and identifies strong seasonal concentration of climate-conditioned adequacy stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: