Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Acute limb ischemia (ALI) couples abrupt arterial occlusion with innate immune activation, endothelial injury, and reperfusion-related inflammation. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) integrates neutrophilia and stress-associated lymphopenia, but its value for identifying patients at risk of early death or major limb loss requires further evaluation. Methods We retrospectively studied 115 adults treated for ALI at a single tertiary center. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of all-cause death or major amputation within 30 days. Associations and discrimination were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and Cox regression. As a secondary exploratory within-cohort analysis, incremental discrimination was assessed by comparing Rutherford classification alone with Rutherford classification plus NLR. Results Sixteen patients (13.9%) experienced the composite outcome, including 5 deaths and 11 major amputations. Median NLR was 8.9 [interquartile range, 6.3-14.4] in patients with an event and 3.3 [2.4–5.5] in those without an event ( P < 0.001). The composite-outcome area under the curve was 0.886 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.810–0.961). The cohort-derived candidate cutoff was 5.7, with apparent sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 76.8% when selected and evaluated in the same cohort. Each doubling of NLR remained associated with higher risk after Rutherford adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.55–4.51; P < 0.001). In an exploratory analysis developed and evaluated in the same cohort, adding NLR to Rutherford classification increased the apparent 30-day AUC from 0.835 to 0.968 (delta AUC, 0.133; descriptive paired DeLong P = 0.0015). Conclusion Preoperative NLR was associated with the 30-day composite of death or major amputation and showed apparent early discrimination in this cohort. Its candidate cutoff and exploratory complementary value require external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: