Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Menopausal syndrome substantially diminishes health-related quality of life in midlife women globally. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has long been the standard of care for symptom management; however, long-term safety concerns—including elevated risks of breast malignancy, cardiovascular events, and venous thromboembolism—have prompted growing interest in holistic, non-pharmacological alternatives. Direct longitudinal comparative data across Southeast Asian populations remain scarce.Objective: To evaluate and contrast the efficacy of HRT versus a structured integrative intervention programme on symptom severity and quality of life over a 24-month follow-up period.Methods: This prospective, comparative longitudinal study enrolled 500 women aged 45–60 years presenting with moderate-to-severe menopausal syndrome across six Type B hospitals in Indonesia between January 2023 and December 2025. Participants were allocated to either HRT (conjugated equine oestrogen plus progestin; n = 250) or integrative care (individualised lifestyle modification, cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and standardised phytoestrogen supplementation; n = 250). Primary outcomes were change in Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score and WHO Quality of Life–BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) domain scores at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. Mixed-effects regression models were used to estimate group differences over time.Results: Both groups demonstrated statistically significant reductions in MRS scores over the study period (p < 0.001 for each). HRT produced more rapid symptomatic improvement at 6 months (adjusted mean difference −6.4; 95% confidence interval −7.8 to −5.0; p < 0.001). By 24 months, the between-group difference was no longer statistically significant (−0.4; −1.1 to 0.3; p = 0.08). Integrative-care participants recorded significantly higher WHOQOL-BREF domain scores at 24 months, particularly in the psychological (difference 8.2; p < 0.001) and social (difference 8.3; p < 0.001) domains.Conclusion: HRT confers rapid, short-term relief of menopausal symptoms, whereas integrative non-pharmacological interventions yield equivalent long-term symptomatic control and superior sustained quality-of-life outcomes. A stratified, shared-decision approach—aligning treatment selection with patient priorities, risk profiles, and cultural context—is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herawati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: