Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper computes, from stated assumptions, a budget that is usually quoted without its arithmetic. The headline results from the deposited calculation are: Eradio = 5.00e+05, frac = 1.5e-03, Eall = 1.50e+06. Lightning is detected worldwide by its radio emission, yet the radio waves carry only a tiny share of the flash's energy. The calculation is algebraic, every input is named in the Methods, and the deposited code reproduces every quoted number. A comparison with the neutron-branch density bound of the underlying frame is carried through and returns a negative result in plain terms: local densities in this problem are tens of orders of magnitude below that bound, so the bound changes no number reported here. The study is simulated and computed, not measured, and its conclusions are confined to the representative event described in the Methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: