Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Food security in Indonesia represents a complex governance challenge exacerbated by climate change, inequality, and fragmented leadership. Current capacity-building models remain overly technical, neglecting the systemic thinking and culturally rooted ethical governance required for resilience. This study aims to develop and validate a competency- and values-based leadership training framework integrating global sustainability principles with Indonesia’s national philosophy (Pancasila) and national resilience frameworks. Methods Employing a rigorous mixed-methods design, the research triangulates stakeholder mapping (n = 12), the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for challenge prioritization, and a modified Delphi method for expert validation (n = 17). Quality Function Deployment, specifically the House of Quality (HOQ), was utilized to systematically map validated competencies to training modules. Results AHP results identified climate change as the paramount threat (weight: 0.214), closely followed by income disparity (0.210) and food safety (0.198), highlighting their deeply interconnected nature (Consistency Ratio = 0.00)… Delphi validation confirmed robust content validity and consensus across five novel competency domains: cognitive-strategic, system governance, socio-ecological, digital transformation, and ethics/local wisdom (Overall Mean = 4.69; Aiken’s V > 0.83). Conclusions The culmination is an empirically validated, 56-hour, eight-module training framework. By transcending conventional technical training, this study provides policymakers with a scientifically grounded, culturally resonant blueprint to cultivate food system leaders capable of navigating complex socio-ecological vulnerabilities while championing collective responsibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Indri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: