Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Segmentation has always been at the heart of marketing strategy, but the way companies split their customers into groups has changed a lot over the last decade. Where firms once relied mostly on age, income and location, many now let machine learning models find the groupings on their own based on what people actually do, not just who they are on paper. This report looks at how AI is reshaping customer segmentation, how it differs from the demographic and psychographic methods we're taught in the standard STP (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning) framework, and where the real gains actually show up for a business. Amazon and Netflix are used here as the main case studies simply because their segmentation practices are well documented and both companies have spoken openly about how central this is to their revenue. I have also brought in Myntra as a domestic example, to show this isn't just a Silicon Valley thing anymore. I have also tried to spend some time on the limits of this approach the privacy questions it raises, the risk of segments getting so narrow they stop being useful, and the data-quality problems that quietly undo a lot of AI segmentation projects in practice. My overall argument, in short: AI does not really replace a marketer's judgement in segmentation, it just shifts what that judgement is applied to. Instead of picking which variables to segment on, the job becomes figuring out which AI-generated segments are actually worth acting on.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vridhi babbar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: