Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hydraulic conductivity is a key hydrogeological parameter in groundwater seepage analysis and dewatering design. Hydraulic conductivity directly affects the prediction accuracy of groundwater drawdown and dewatering performance. Field single-well and multi-well pumping tests were combined with a three-dimensional unsteady seepage model established using Visual MODFLOW Flex 6.1. An inverse analysis of hydraulic conductivity was conducted for the ⑦ confined sandy-pebble aquifer. The results show that groundwater drawdown during the single-well pumping test was concentrated around the pumping well and decreased with distance. Under multi-well pumping conditions, stabilized drawdown exceeded 15 m at several northern and western observation wells, while eastern and southern wells mainly showed 8–11 m. The single-well inversion yielded a local-scale equivalent hydraulic conductivity of 28.75 m/d, with a mean relative error (MRE) of 3.46%. This value was subsequently used as the initial parameter for evaluating the applicability of a homogeneous hydraulic conductivity under multi-well pumping conditions. The final engineering-scale zonal parameterization comprised an equivalent hydraulic conductivity of 28.75 m/d in the western zone, retained from the single-well inversion, and 90.00 m/d in the eastern zone, obtained through zonal calibration. The resulting calibration MRE was 3.02%. Compared with the homogeneous model, the zonal model achieved closer agreement between simulated and measured drawdowns under the tested multi-well pumping condition, indicating improved calibration performance in representing the observed spatial variation in groundwater response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: