Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: GLP-1 and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) delay gastric emptying, increasing residual gastric content (RGC) during upper endoscopy (EGS) under standard fasting. Concurrent colonoscopy requires 24–48 h of a clear-liquid diet and osmotic bowel preparation, which may mitigate this risk without drug interruption. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify RGC rates in GLP-1 RA users undergoing combined same-session EGS and colonoscopy compared with EGS alone. Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched without date restriction. We included studies enrolling adults on GLP-1 RAs undergoing elective EGS with or without concurrent colonoscopy. The primary outcome was clinically significant RGC at the time of endoscopy. Random-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. Results: Of 1683 records identified, eight studies met eligibility criteria and were included. RGC rates in combined-procedure groups ranged from 0% to 4.9%. Pooled analysis demonstrated significantly higher odds of RGC among EGS-alone patients (OR 3.76, 95% CI 2.81–5.03; I2 = 0%). The effect was consistent across observational studies (OR 3.71, 95% CI 2.77–4.96; I2 = 0%) and directionally equal in the single RCT. No procedure was aborted due to RGC in the combined-procedure groups. Conclusions: In adults on GLP-1 RAs, concurrent colonoscopy with standard bowel preparation appears to effectively mitigate RGC risk during same-session EGS across eight studies with consistent, large-magnitude effect estimates. These findings support the hypothesis that bowel preparation achieves adequate gastric emptying, potentially obviating routine GLP-1 RA interruption in this procedural context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naimzada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: