Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the immobilization of Rhodococcus sp. BEI-13A on grape-waste biochar (BC@R) as a sustainable decontamination strategy. Biochar acted as a microbial support and as a matrix contributing to chromium retention, while the immobilized microorganism contributed to Cr(VI) transformation. Batch assays were performed under varying pH, BC@R dosage, initial Cr(VI) concentration, temperature, and contact time using a fractional factorial design to screen the effects of these variables on Cr(VI) decontamination efficiency. The highest Cr(VI) decontamination efficiency observed among the experimental runs (18.55%) was obtained at pH 6, 3 g L -1 BC@R, 350 mg L -1 Cr(VI), 25 °C, and 48 h; this condition represents the best observed treatment within the tested design rather than a confirmed global optimum. Statistical analysis indicated that only Cr(VI) concentration and temperature significantly affected system performance (p < 0.05). Kinetic modeling of the apparent specific Cr(VI) depletion response showed that BC was better described by the pseudo-first-order model, whereas BC@R was slightly better described by the pseudo-second-order model. For BC@R, the PSO model yielded a model-estimated apparent equilibrium Cr(VI) depletion value of 107.46 ± 9.78 mg g -1 . Because q t was calculated from the decrease in aqueous Cr(VI), these kinetic values integrate Cr(VI) disappearance associated with both aqueous-phase chromium removal and Cr(VI)-to-Cr(III) transformation and should not be interpreted as pure adsorption capacities. BC@R exhibited the highest initial volumetric Cr(VI) depletion rates among the tested treatment configurations and maintained activity throughout the 32 h kinetic assay. Although the overall decontamination efficiency was relatively low, the results demonstrate the feasibility of combining grape-waste biochar and immobilized Rhodococcus sp. BEI-13A for Cr(VI) decontamination under comparatively high chromium concentrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: