Key result
Percent-predicted OUES shows no prognostic advantage over absolute OUES for heart failure mortality.
Why the study?
The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) is a prognostic indicator in chronic heart failure (CHF), but whether absolute values or percent-predicted values calculated from different equations provide more accurate mortality prediction remained unclear.
Does percent-predicted oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) using Hollenberg, Buys, and Milani equations improve mortality prediction compared to absolute OUES values in patients with chronic heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,180)
No
Does percent-predicted oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) using Hollenberg, Buys, and Milani equations improve mortality prediction compared to absolute OUES values in patients with chronic heart failure?
Both absolute and percent-predicted oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) equations provide comparable prognostic accuracy for all-cause mortality in chronic heart failure, though sex-specific cut-offs are needed for clinical assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports using simpler absolute OUES with sex-specific cut-offs for HF risk stratification; leaves open whether these retrospective thresholds improve prognostic utility in prospective validation.
Aim: The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) is a prognostic indicator obtained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Although various equations exist for calculating predicted OUES, it remains unclear whether absolute or percent-predicted values offer a more accurate prognostic assessment. To investigate and compare mortality prediction in CHF patients using the OUES absolute values or the percent-predicted approach, incorporating the equations of Hollenberg, Buys, and Milani. Methods: Retrospective cohort study involving CHF patients evaluated at a tertiary university hospital between July 2013 and July 2023. All patients underwent maximal CPX and were followed in a specialized outpatient clinic. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. To compare the prognostic accuracy between different approaches, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 1.180 patients were included, 57% male, with a mean age of 55 ± 12 years. The median follow-up was 5.0 years (IQR 3.0 to 7.2 years), resulting in 147 deaths (12.5%). The area under de curve (AUC) was 0.71 to 0.72 for males, and 0.60 to 0.63 for females, without statistical difference in the AUC between absolute and percent-predicted OUES. Different cut-offs were identified for each sex for predicting mortality and all OUES metrics remained independent predictors in multivariate models using sex and age. Conclusions: OUES, in both absolute and percent-predicted forms, demonstrated similar accuracy in predicting mortality in CHF, with sex-specific cut-offs influencing clinical assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure (CHF) (n=1,180). Percent-predicted oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) using Hollenberg, Buys, and Milani equations vs. Absolute oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) values was evaluated on All-cause mortality. Absolute and percent-predicted OUES demonstrated similar accuracy in predicting mortality in chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: