Key result
Physical therapists in Japan reported 60.8% awareness of onco-cardiology, but only 2.5% of those experienced with CTR-CVT reported full physiotherapy implementation.
Cross-Sectional (n=158)
Yes
Despite moderate conceptual awareness of onco-cardiology among Japanese physical therapists, full clinical implementation of cardio-oncology rehabilitation is extremely rare (2.5%) due to knowledge gaps, lack of clear referral criteria, and poor multidisciplinary collaboration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Moderate awareness fails to ensure full cardio-oncology physiotherapy implementation; leaves open whether targeted training and collaboration improve adoption.
Background: Cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE) has gained attention as a multidisciplinary approach to managing cardiovascular complications in patients with cancer. Physical therapists play a central role in delivering CORE, but their overall awareness of onco-cardiology, extent of CORE implementation, and barriers to its clinical practice remain poorly understood, so in this study we aimed to investigate the awareness, clinical practice, and perceived barriers to CORE among physical therapists. Methods and Results: This cross-sectional study used a web-based questionnaire distributed to members of the Japanese Society of Physical Therapy for Oncology and Lymphedema. A total of 158 responses were analyzed (response rate, 22.7%). Overall, 96 respondents (60.8%) reported a general understanding of onco-cardiology, and 80 (50.6%) had experience providing physiotherapy for patients with cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT). Among these 80 respondents, only 2 (2.5%) reported that physiotherapy for CTR-CVT was fully implemented. Major barriers to CORE implementation included a lack of therapists with expertise in onco-cardiology (65 respondents, 81.3%), insufficient cardiovascular knowledge (48 respondents, 60.0%), and unclear timing and criteria for initiating physiotherapy (42 respondents, 52.5%). Only 2 respondents (2.5%) reported “sufficient” multidisciplinary collaboration. Conclusions: Awareness of onco-cardiology and implementation of CORE among physical therapists remain insufficient. Key barriers include a lack of specialized knowledge, healthcare system limitations, and insufficient multidisciplinary collaboration. Addressing these barriers may facilitate the integration of CORE into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daiyu et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE) and cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) (n=158). Cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE) awareness and clinical practice was evaluated on Awareness of onco-cardiology and full implementation of physiotherapy for patients with cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT). Physical therapists in Japan reported 60.8% awareness of onco-cardiology, but only 2.5% of those experienced with CTR-CVT reported full physiotherapy implementation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: