Key result
Intravenous iron did not increase the risk of any infection and reduced recurrent heart-failure hospitalisations.
Why the study?
Intravenous iron may improve symptoms and reduce heart-failure hospitalisation in adults with heart failure and iron deficiency, but its effect on infection risk remains uncertain.
Does intravenous iron affect infection risk and clinical outcomes (such as heart-failure hospitalisations and all-cause mortality) compared with placebo, usual care, or oral iron in adults with heart failure and iron deficiency?
Meta-Analysis (n=7,925)
Mixed (double-blind, single-blind, and open-label trials included)
Randomised controlled trials included
Does intravenous iron affect infection risk and clinical outcomes (such as heart-failure hospitalisations and all-cause mortality) compared with placebo, usual care, or oral iron in adults with heart failure and iron deficiency?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In adults with heart failure and iron deficiency, intravenous iron probably reduces heart-failure hospitalisations without a clear increase in participant-level infection risk, though sparse and inconsistent safety reporting limits definitive conclusions on infection safety.
Background Intravenous iron may improve symptoms and reduce heart-failure hospitalisation, but its effect on infection risk remains uncertain. We evaluated infection risk and clinical outcomes in adults with heart failure and iron deficiency.Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus from inception to 16 April 2026, with registry and regulatory searches through 18 October 2026. Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous iron with placebo, usual care or oral iron were eligible. Participants experiencing infection and infection episodes were analysed separately using random-effects binomial-normal and Poisson-normal models, respectively. Common-effect models were prioritised for mortality and hospitalisation, with random-effects sensitivity analyses. Risk of bias and certainty were assessed using Risk of Bias 2 and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.Results Nineteen reports represented 18 independent cohorts. Three trials contributed participant-level data for any infection (1873 participants; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.08; low certainty), and three contributed data for serious infection (1890 participants; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.21; very low certainty). Infection-episode analyses were inconclusive: episode-burden ratios were 1.07 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.86; four trials) for any infection and 1.11 (0.82 to 1.42; seven trials) for serious infection, both with very low GRADE certainty. Intravenous iron probably reduced total first and recurrent heart-failure hospitalisations (three trials; rate ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.90; moderate certainty). Intravenous iron probably has little or no effect on all-cause mortality (six trials; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.03; moderate certainty). Quality-of-life findings generally favoured intravenous iron, but differences in instruments, score types and assessment times precluded pooling.Conclusions Intravenous iron probably reduces heart-failure related hospitalisations. No clear increase in infection was observed. Incomplete reporting, inconsistent ascertainment and sparse data limit inference about infection safety. Future trials should prespecify standardised infection outcomes, and report affected participants, recurrent events and person-time.PROSPERO registration number CRD420261355349.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mandal et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure and iron deficiency (n=7,925). Intravenous iron (ferric carboxymaltose, ferric derisomaltose, iron sucrose, sodium ferric gluconate) vs. Placebo, usual care, no intravenous iron, or oral iron was evaluated on Participants experiencing at least one infection of any severity during safety follow-up (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.08, p=0.107). Intravenous iron did not increase the risk of any infection and reduced recurrent heart-failure hospitalisations.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: