Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and objectives The linear relation between human metaphase chromosome length and DNA content has never been rigorously reconciled with modern Hi-C models of mitotic chromatin folding. We tested whether the relation implies a quantitative unit of mitotic chromosome organization. Methods We pooled metaphase lengths for 24 human chromosomes from five cytogenetic studies of cultured peripheral lymphocytes and regressed length against base-pair content from GRCh38 and T2T-CHM13 v2.0. Pre-specified analyses comprised ordinary least-squares and power-law fits, arm-level decomposition, and reconciliation with the Gibcus 2018 helical loop-array model. Orthogonal validation used Rao 2014 Hi-C boundary counts and Pope 2014 Repli-Seq. Results Length scales linearly with DNA content as L (μm) = 0.0329 x Mb + 0.043 (R-squared = 0.998, power-law exponent 0.98 + /- 0.01), with a cross-karyotype compaction density of 33.4 + /- 1.0 nm/Mb. T2T-CHM13 reanalysis identifies satellite over-condensation; the arm-level residual correlates with p-arm fraction (r = 0.65, p = 5.6e-4). We propose an operational Metaphase Chromatin Unit (MCU) as a quantitative scaling unit (not a discrete structural quantum, as quantization tests are negative): 1 MCU = 7.6 Mb DNA = 0.25 μm axial length, numerically corresponding to one Gibcus late-metaphase helical turn; the human haploid genome scales to 406 MCUs. The pairwise megabase-shift slope of 32.75 nm/Mb (R-squared = 0.996) and the approximately 6 Mb Abbe optical detection threshold correctly classify 9 of 9 microdeletion syndromes as karyotype-visible versus FISH-required. Conclusions The MCU provides a unified quantitative unit for human mitotic chromosome organization, integrating cytogenetic, Hi-C, polymer-biophysical, and clinical scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goyal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: