Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective Given the growing popularity of arts-based interventions, our study examined the effects of drawing during an interview about a distressing event on conscious event recall and intrusions.Method We used a single-blind design where participants who had experienced a negative/stressful event were randomly allocated to draw while sharing a negative experience (event-drawing condition; n = 20), draw something unrelated to the event while sharing (comfort-drawing condition; n = 19), or only talk about the experience (talk-only control condition; n = 20).Results Event-drawing increased the amount of information reported (d = 0.88) and forensically relevant statements regarding event locations (d = 0.73) during interviews compared to talk-only. Comfort-drawing did not have the same memory benefits as event-drawing and neither event-drawing nor comfort-drawing during an interview influenced intrusions compared to talk-only.Conclusions Future research is needed to confirm whether the conscious recall benefits of event-drawing during a distressing experience extend to event accuracy. Continued research on the effects of drawing on autobiographical conscious recall and intrusions will enable updating of best practices for drawing interventions in interviews.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maddox et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: