Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article develops a maqāṣid-based framework for governing religious outputs generated by artificial intelligence in light of fiqh al-maʾālāt. Religious outputs form a distinct governance domain because they may shape belief, scriptural interpretation, moral judgment, practice, perceptions of communities, and reliance on authority. The study addresses the absence of an integrated output-level model connecting source integrity and fair religious representation with contextual risk classification, protected interests, consequence assessment, qualified human review, and institutional accountability. Using a qualitative normative-constructive approach, the authors interpret selected foundational jurisprudential sources and relevant contemporary scholarship, directly relate the extracted principles to religious-output governance problems, and draw on established AI-governance instruments to formulate institutional and procedural safeguards. The proposed Maqāṣid–Maʾālāt Religious Output Governance Framework (MMROGF) comprises eight governance dimensions, four context-sensitive risk tiers, ex ante, concurrent, and ex post controls, a ten-criterion assessment card, and five governance decisions. Five hypothetical scenarios and a detailed illustrative triple-divorce example demonstrate the proposed decision pathway; they do not establish empirical validity, inter-reviewer reliability, or institutional effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samoh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: