Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study develops an AIS-based, time-resolved Port-LCA framework to estimate port-boundary well-to-wake emissions from alternative marine fuels. The framework converts AIS-derived vessel trajectories into distance, speed, propulsion power, fuel consumption, and lifecycle emissions through Haversine-based trajectory reconstruction, speed–power relationships, SFOC curves, and fuel-specific WTT and TTW emission factors. Holt–Winters forecasting, linked to real-GDP-driven TEU demand, is then used to project port-boundary emissions to 2050. Using the Port of Busan as a case study, seven container vessels and five fuel pathways are assessed: MDO, methanol, e-methanol, ammonia, and e-ammonia. Projected vessel demand increases from approximately 543 vessels in 2025 to 819 vessels by 2050 in the central scenario, with a 2050 range of approximately 721–919 vessels. Mean WTW emission intensities range from 4056 kg CO 2 -eq/vessel-hour for e-ammonia to 23,967 kg CO 2 -eq/vessel-hour for ammonia. Fleet-composition sensitivity changes absolute emissions by approximately +15% to −20%, while fuel rankings remain stable. The results provide proof-of-concept evidence for AIS-based Port-LCA but should be interpreted as model-derived estimates rather than a fully validated Busan emissions inventory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chalaris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: