Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article reports on the refinement and validation of the ERO scale designed to assess teachers’ relationship with oral communication. Study 1 (N = 569) used exploratory factor analysis to identify eight dimensions—affective, conceptual, axiological, praxeological, metadiscursive, interactional, identity-related, and relational—and to make the final selection of 25 items. Study 2 (N = 527) used confirmatory factor analysis to validate this structure, showing good fit and satisfactory reliability. Validity evidence based on relations with other variables was supported through correlations with self-perceived communication competence. Beyond its psychometric validity, the ERO offers a structured framework for teacher education. By making these eight dimensions visible, it supports teachers’ reflection on their relationship with oral communication and provides educators with a diagnostic tool for more targeted professional development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colognesi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: