Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background : Skeletal Class II and III malocclusion can cause significant functional, aesthetic, and psychological concerns. Combined surgical-orthodontic treatment is often necessary, and understanding its psychosocial effects is vital for evaluating treatment outcomes. Aims and Objectives : To evaluate short-term psychosocial changes in adults with Class II and III malocclusion undergoing combined surgical-orthodontic treatment using the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ). Materials and Methods : A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Orthodontics, XX Dental College, on 24 adults (12 Class II, 12 Class III). Assessments were done at one month pre-surgery (T0), one month post-surgery (T1), and three months post-surgery (T2) using PIDAQ. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics, Independent t-test, and Repeated Measures ANOVA. Results : At baseline (T0), Group 2 (Class III) patients had significantly higher PIDAQ scores (76.83 ± 5.94) compared to Group 1 (Class II) (65.92 ± 8.28). Both groups improved post-surgery, with greater reduction in Class III. At T1, scores were 42.58 ± 3.20 (Class II) and 38.67 ± 3.77 (Class III). At T2, they declined further to 31.33 ± 2.46 and 22.33 ± 2.27, respectively, with differences remaining significant. Overall, Class III patients showed greater improvements across all domains, with a total reduction of 70.9% compared to 52.5% in Class II. Conclusion : Combined surgical-orthodontic treatment significantly enhances psychosocial well-being in Class II and III malocclusion. Class III patients demonstrated more pronounced improvements, reflecting greater gains in quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: