Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In experimental physics, diagnostic systems produce signals that reflect reproducible physical behavior. Under similar operating conditions, recurring physical processes manifest as structurally similar signal shapes, establishing a direct correspondence between physical behavior and the temporal structure of measured signals. These recurring structures, referred to as structural patterns, constitute the natural entry point for large-scale data analysis, as they encode the essential characteristics of the underlying physical phenomena. In long-pulse nuclear fusion experiments, thousands of diagnostics continuously generate high-resolution time series data during the production of discharges. Identifying all occurrences of a given structural pattern (corresponding to a specific physical event) in large datasets is a critical but challenging task. Traditional workflows based on manual visual inspection or discharge-oriented queries do not scale to modern data volumes and limit the statistical exploitation of reproducible behavior. This work presents a scalable framework for shape-based similarity search in large-scale time-series distributed collections. The proposed method combines Haar wavelet-based dimensionality reduction, sliding-window vectorization, amplitude-invariant normalization, cosine similarity, and FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search) exact indexing to enable efficient retrieval of structurally similar patterns. The framework was validated on a dataset of synthetic signals containing approximately 1.8 million samples each. Experimental results show that the proposed approach preserves retrieval accuracy while reducing query time to 34 ms on a dataset of approximately 2.62 million indexed subsequences (10 signals). Scalability experiments over the complete dataset (690 signals, approximately 181 million indexed subsequences) demonstrate near-linear growth in query time, confirming the suitability of the proposed approach for large-scale fusion diagnostic data analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wandosell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: