Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract:This study presents a systematic optimization of grouting material formulations using triethanolamine (TEA) and straw ash via the Box-Behnken Design (BBD) of Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The research successfully developed highly significant quadratic regression models for predicting key performance indicators, including fluidity and 28-day compressive strength, with R 2 values exceeding 0.95. Analysis revealed that the main effects, interaction effects, and quadratic terms of TEA dosage, straw ash content, and W/C ratio all significantly influenced the material’s properties. Multi-objective optimization identified an optimal formulation: 0.65% TEA, 5% straw ash, and a W/C ratio of 0.33. Validation tests confirmed that this formulation achieved a fluidity of 189.4 mm and a compressive strength of 34.6 MPa, with an error of less than 5%. The findings demonstrate the efficacy of RSM in designing high-performance, sustainable grouting materials, offering a viable pathway for the valorization of agricultural waste.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: