Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pitfall traps reveal variation in ground-active arthropod assemblages, but their captures reflect both organism abundance and surface activity. We examined epigeic macrofauna along a tropical semiarid mountain catena at Pico do Jabre, northeastern Brazil, using 30 pitfall traps (ten each at summit, midslope and footslope) exposed for 48 h during campaigns on 13–15 January and 15–17 October 2021. The 12-group dataset comprised 2,339 individuals. The October (dry-season) campaign yielded 2,127 captures, including 1,609 ants (Formicidae; 75.65%); the January (rainy-season) campaign yielded 212 captures, including one ant (0.47%). Shannon diversity was lower in October than in January (H′ = 0.802 versus 1.905), and excluding ants increased October H′ to 1.013 but scarcely changed January H′ (1.884). Composition also varied along the catena: ants dominated all three October positions, whereas Dermaptera dominated the January summit and Coleoptera the January footslope. Trap-level coefficients of variation revealed substantial within-position heterogeneity (129.4–154.1% in October; 58.8–127.9% in January). Rainfall observations from the regional reference station showed 632.7 mm in 2021, but no precipitation or soil-moisture measurements were made at individual traps. Accordingly, these patterns describe campaign-specific activity-density and within-position dispersion; they neither establish population changes nor identify a causal rainfall mechanism. The catena provides a spatially explicit framework for soil-fauna monitoring while retaining the limitations of a single hillslope and one campaign per season.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marques et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: