Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Space syntax has proven powerful for decoding spatial order in axially planned, wall-enclosed religious architecture, but its applicability to non-linear, terrain-embedded complexes without artificial boundaries remains untested. This study examines whether standard visibility graph analysis (VGA) metrics retain interpretive validity in such environments, using a multi-faith mountain religious complex in Southwest China as a revelatory case. VGA (2 m resolution) across the 14-building site yielded 25,729 valid grid cells. Integration is highly non-uniform (SHI_CV = 2.40, 95% CI [2.28, 2.52]) and strongly clustered in space (Moran’s I = 0.893, p = 0.001), concentrating at topographic choke-points rather than architectural centres. Pairwise comparisons show negligible effect sizes between religious groups, and exact Mann–Whitney U tests confirm no significant differences (all p ≥ 0.90): topographic position, rather than religious affiliation, is the leading correlate of integration. Intelligibility is critically low (R2 = 0.056, p < 0.001) and robust to GPS positioning error. These findings invert the standard interpretation of integration, as a measure of topographic passage necessity rather than deliberate spatial order, extending space syntax theory to geometrically unordered environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: