Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A star that wanders too close to Sagittarius A* is pulled apart by the tide, and the boundary of survival is computable star by star. This paper evaluates tidal radii across the stellar mass range of the nuclear cluster. A solar-type star is disrupted inside 0.76 AU, 18 gravitational radii; a fifteen-solar-mass star of the kind that populates the S-star cluster has a tidal radius of 1.7 AU. Against these boundaries, the pericentre of S2 at 119 AU is a comfortable 157 tidal radii out, while the reported pericentre of the eccentric star S62 near 18 AU sits only 10.7 tidal radii from disruption for a massive star, and inside the comfort zone of none. The tidal radius equals the Schwarzschild radius, the point beyond which a hole swallows solar-type stars whole without a flare, at a black-hole mass of 1.1e+08 solar masses, two dozen times the actual mass, so disruptions at the Galactic centre remain visible events. Computed from published masses and standard stellar radii.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: