Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SUMMARY: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become central to orthopaedic trauma research, quality assessment, and value-based care. However, selecting an appropriate PROM is a nuanced process. Choosing an instrument that lacks validation for a specific injury type may fail to capture clinically relevant domains, systematically misrepresent outcomes in key patient subgroups, introduce bias, obscure treatment effects, and ultimately mislead clinical decision making. This review used foot and ankle trauma as a case example to provide orthopaedic trauma surgeons with a practical, stepwise framework for PROM selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kyle M. Schweser (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: