Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Safflower filaments grow in random directions, whereas rigid-cutter picking end-effectors have large front ends and a fixed approach posture. To address these problems, a posture-adjustable cable-based clamping–cutting end-effector for safflower filaments was designed. Carried by a Delta parallel robot, it uses a two-axis deflection platform to align its axis with the flower growth direction and replaces rigid jaws and blades with twisted cable clamping and staggered twin-wire cutting. Twisted-string clamping and cutting-stroke models were established to determine the parameters of the guide orifice and the clamping and cutting mechanisms, and an end-effector–flower axis-angle test and a field picking test were conducted. The projected front-end area was 69.1% smaller than that of the previous-generation rigid-blade picking head. In single-attempt picking of 136 safflowers in the field, the complete clamping rate was 95.6%, the cutting success rate after complete clamping was 99.2%, and the clamping–cutting success rate was 94.9%. With the axes aligned (0–10°), the mass picking rate was 90.39%, within the range of values in the literature for rigid-blade end-effectors; at 30–40°, it decreased to 62.07%. The cable-based end-effector reliably clamps and cuts filaments with a small front end, and the end-effector–flower axis angle significantly affects the mass picking rate. These results provide a reference for the development of selective safflower picking equipment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: