Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Satellite-to-ground free-space optical links enable space-based quantum key distribution (QKD) Satellite-to-ground free-space optical links provide an important platform for space-based quantum key distribution (QKD) networks. Continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CVQKD) is compatible with coherent optical communication systems, making it a promising approach for satellite-to-ground QKD. However, atmospheric turbulence introduces wavefront distortion and intensity fluctuations that degrade optical coupling and limit CVQKD performance. Conventional adaptive optics (AO) compensation may involve substantial computational complexity and latency, motivating efficient wavefront prediction for rapidly varying atmospheric channels. In this work, we propose a lightweight Att-ConvGRU-UNet framework for predictive wavefront compensation. The framework combines a multi-scale UNet for spatial feature extraction, a ConvGRU module for temporal modeling, and a convolutional block attention module (CBAM) for adaptive channel- and spatial-feature refinement. Residual learning is employed to predict phase increments and improve training stability. In addition to conventional wavefront metrics, single-mode fiber (SMF) mixing efficiency and secret key rate (SKR) are used as downstream metrics to evaluate the impact of prediction performance on CVQKD. The proposed model achieves a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0030 rad 2 and a structural similarity index (SSIM) of 0.9865 on a three-layer dynamic non-Kolmogorov phase-screen dataset, with 0.342 M trainable parameters. Predictor-side latency is further evaluated at different direct prediction horizons to characterize the trade-off between prediction accuracy and computational time. This work provides a lightweight and computationally efficient predictive solution for atmospheric turbulence compensation in satellite-to-ground CVQKD, offering a promising approach for next-generation space-based quantum communication networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: