Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gliomas are malignant central nervous system tumors characterized by poor prognosis and therapy failure. Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporters mediate multidrug resistance via chemotherapeutic efflux, yet their roles as biomarkers across glioma subtypes remain unclear. We analyzed adult diffuse glioma mRNA expression (n = 693; n = 325) and DNA methylation (n = 159) datasets from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas in silico, stratifying samples according to the 2021 World Health Organization molecular criteria. ABC transporter profiles, patient-matched methylation–expression correlations (n = 26 overlapping patients; 78 paired gene–sample observations), and prognostic values were evaluated using non-parametric tests with false discovery rate (FDR) correction, Kaplan–Meier curves, and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses. Transporter expression and methylation varied significantly by histology and grade. ABCC1 expression increased with malignancy, predicting worse overall survival in univariable analysis (p < 0.0001). Meanwhile, strongly correlated ABCB1 and ABCG2 expressions (Spearman’s ρ = 0.80 in grade 4 tumors) were higher in lower-grade gliomas. Progressive hypomethylation occurred with increasing grade, with significant differential methylation in ABCB1 (FDR p < 0.0001) and ABCG2 (FDR p < 0.0001). In patient-matched integrative analyses, only ABCC1 exhibited a significant inverse association between methylation and expression (Spearman’s ρ = −0.58, p = 0.0019). Baseline clinical multivariable Cox regression (n = 139) suggested that higher ABCB1 and ABCG2 methylation (HR = 0.11, p = 0.03; HR = 0.12, p = 0.04 per 1.0-unit β increase, corresponding to HR = 0.80 and 0.81 per 0.1-unit β increase) may act as protective factors independent of age and grade (though attenuated upon IDH adjustment), whereas higher grade and ABCG2 expression (n = 542; HR = 1.03, p = 0.001) emerged as independent risk factors. Specific ABC transporter profiles could serve as candidate prognostic biomarkers in glioma, warranting external and translational validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heming et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: