Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cryptoasset prices are often treated as if they reveal a single underlying value, even when trading is thin, market access is fragmented, and the asset provides no enforceable claim on cash flows. This paper develops a conceptual framework for assessing the reliability of quoted prices in decentralized asset markets. Price reliability refers to cross-venue consistency, depth-adjusted stability, shock resilience, and manipulation resistance; it does not require an observed price to equal a unique intrinsic or fundamental value. The framework distinguishes four mechanisms often compressed into the term consensus: protocol consensus validates the ledger, oracle consensus supplies external information, market consensus aggregates orders into executable prices, and governance consensus determines how rules and control rights change. It characterizes effective consensus quality as a multidimensional diagnostic profile assessed through independence, diversity, redundancy, and credible participation across these layers. Five propositions address the roles of market liquidity, source independence, shared infrastructure, governance participation, and feedback between oracle inputs and automated liquidation. By integrating these mechanisms and their cross-layer dependencies, the framework offers a basis for future measurement, governance design, and regulatory assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: