Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
If relic neutrinos decay invisibly with a rest-frame lifetime equal to the age of the universe, only 0.368 of them survive to be detected today; at ten times the age the surviving fraction is 0.905, at half the age it falls to 0.135, and at a hundred times the age it is 0.9900. This paper computes the survival bookkeeping, states the time-dilation caveat that makes the simple exponential conservative, and argues that the observed consistency of the energy-density budget already disfavours lifetimes near the cosmic age, so that a future capture experiment should plan on a substantially intact background while treating a deficit as a possible decay signal. The frame under study supplies no lifetime prediction of its own, which is recorded as an explicit gap rather than filled by assumption. Computed, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: