Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Open Science is becoming an important part of responsible research policy in Europe. Universities are expected to support open access to publications, adequate research data management (including their FAIRification), citizen science, and broader recognition of open research practices. The University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (USB) has already undertaken several Open Science activities, but these activities have so far been only partly coordinated at the institutional level. Methods This case study describes the development and planned implementation of the Open Science Strategy at the University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice. It is based on the final institutional strategy, mapping of the current situation, consultation with faculties, and alignment with European and international Open Science frameworks. The case is structured around five key areas: policy implementation, infrastructure development, public engagement, career integration, and researcher support. Results The strategy defines a coordinated institutional framework for Open Science. Its main goals include a comprehensive open access policy, FAIR-compliant research data, mandatory Data Management Plans, a professional institutional repository for publications and data, stronger support for citizen science, recognition of Open Science activities in career assessment, and regular training for PhD candidates and research staff. The implementation framework also includes planned monitoring mechanisms, faculty-level coordination, and support from a dedicated Open Science Team. Conclusions The case shows how a medium-sized university can move from scattered Open Science activities to a structured institutional framework. The main lesson is that implementing Open Science requires not only technical infrastructure but also clear policies, training, coordination, long-term support, and recognition of Open Science practices in academic careers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sláma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: