Left heart AV intervals differed significantly from right heart AV intervals during right atrial pacing and right ventricular sensing or pacing (-130 to +300 msec; P<0.001).
Observational (n=16)
16 patients with DDD and AAI pacemakers evaluated for left heart AV intervals during pacing.
Right heart AAI and DDD pacing vs Programmed right heart AV intervals (RAV)
Difference between left heart AV intervals (LAV) and right heart AV intervals (RAV), p=<0.001
p-value: p=<0.001
DDD and AAI pacemakers are considered physiological, since they preserve atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. Artificial pacing, however, is performed largely from right heart chambers, causing aberrant depolarization pathways. Pacing at the right atrial appendage (RAP) is known to delay left atrial contraction due to interatrial conduction time (IACT), and right ventricular (RV) apical pacing (RVP) delays left ventricular (LV) contraction due to interventricular conduction time (TVCT). These delays may render the left heart AV intervals (LAV) either too short or too Jong, thus affecting LV systolic function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the actual LAV intervals during conventional, right heart AAI and DDD pacing. Resulting LAV intervals were compared to programmed AV values during all DDD pacing modalities. Ten patients with DDD and six patients with AAI pacemakers were studied. IACT was measured from the atrial spike to the onset of left P wave, as recorded by an esophageal lead. Systolic time intervals were measured using either a carotid pulse tracing or a densitogram (photoplethysmography). LV function was appraised by measuring rate‐corrected LV ejection time (LVETc). IVCT was measured indirectly as the lengthening of LV preelection period (PEPJ caused by RV pacing, as compared to normal depolarization pathway. Intrinsic‘ACT and IVCT were considered zero. Right heart AV intervals (RAV) were measured from surface ECG and LAVs were calculated according to the following equations: Sinus Rhythm: LAV = RAV; Atrial Pace 4‐ Ventricular Sense: LAV= RAV − IACT; Atrial Sense + Ventricular Pace: LAV = RAV + IVCT; Sequential AV Pace: LAV = RAV − IACT + IVCT, Results: 1. IACT: mean = 73 msec, range: 35–130; IVCT: mean = 50 msec, range: 44–100. 2. Compared to RAVs, LAVs were either too short or too long (−130 to + 300 msec: P < 0.001 J in RAP 4‐ RVS and RAS + RVP. Conclusions: 1. LAV differed significantly from RAV during AP + VS and AS + VP. 2. “Physiological” RAV intervals in DDD and AAI may cause nonphysiological LAV, possibly affecting LV function. 3. IACT and IVCT should be accounted for when programming DDD PM to provide physiological LAV.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Raúl Chirife
Tufts University
Daniel F. Ortega
Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva
Arturo Salazar
PeaceHealth St. John Medical Center
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chirife et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Patients with DDD and AAI pacemakers (n=16). Right heart AAI and DDD pacing vs. Programmed right heart AV intervals (RAV) was evaluated on Difference between left heart AV intervals (LAV) and right heart AV intervals (RAV) (p=<0.001). Left heart AV intervals differed significantly from right heart AV intervals during right atrial pacing and right ventricular sensing or pacing (-130 to +300 msec; P<0.001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22914ab65eef78bdffa31a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02760.x