Abstract Under proper management forest wildlife could contribute much more to the war program in the form of meat, fish, skins, furs, fats, and recreation than it is now doing. Frequently this contribution could be made to the advantage of the wildlife itself through the removal of surplus populations. Some way must be found, both in war and in peace, to harvest the allowable crop and at the same time to retain public support of conservation measures.
Chase et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: