Scoping review assesses IV furosemide's effects on acute left ventricular failure in prehospital settings, indicating potential risks and benefits.
Background: Heart failure (HF) is complex and difficult to diagnose in prehospital settings, leading to potential overuse of treatments such as intravenous (IV) furosemide. This prompted a scoping review to assess its effectiveness in managing acute left ventricular failure (ALVF) in emergency contexts. Aim: This study aims to enhance understanding of IV furosemide use in high-acuity prehospital emergencies and its implications for future diuretic therapies. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on literature exploring the use of IV furosemide in high-acuity emergency settings. Results: Three main themes emerged: the accuracy of ALVF diagnosis and its impact on outcomes; the influence of transport times on furosemide administration; and the potential risks of furosemide outweighing its benefits. Conclusion: IV furosemide can alleviate HF symptoms, but prehospital diagnostic challenges may increase the risk or harm to patients, with alternative treatments offering more benefits and fewer adverse effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrews et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: