Comparative analysis highlights EU regulatory acts' effectiveness over Russia's in the circular economy, suggesting new business opportunities.
Subject. This article discusses the participation of retail business in the circular economy. Objectives. The article aims to compare the development of the Russian and international legal frameworks in the field of circular economy. Methods. For the study, we considered the regulatory legal acts of the European Union, China, and the Russian Federation. Results. The article reveals that EU has the most effective regulatory legal acts. The most influential Russian environmental legal act is the Federal Law on Industrial and Consumer Waste. Conclusions. The participation of retail enterprises in the circular economy contributes to environmental protection and creates new opportunities for business.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ратнер et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: