Retrospective analysis reveals 6.2% incidence of hemodynamic valve deterioration post-TAVI, indicating smaller valve size increases risk.
This study aimed to elucidate the incidence, risk factors, and midterm outcomes associated with hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD) 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This was a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of consecutive TAVIs from 2012 to 2022. Patients with immediate post-TAVI, 30-day, and 1-year echocardiographic data were included. HVD was defined per the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 definition for stage 2 moderate HVD. The cohort was dichotomized by the presence or absence of HVD at 1-year follow-up. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival estimation, and Cox regression for mortality were performed. A total of 4317 patients underwent TAVI during the study period. Of those, 2123 had complete 1-year echocardiographic follow-up. Of these patients, 131 (6.2%) exhibited echocardiographic evidence of HVD 1 year after TAVI. One-year HVD patients were significantly younger and more likely to have smaller aortic annuli (23 mm vs 24 mm; P < .01) compared with non-HVD patients. On multivariable regression, larger implanted valve size was a protective factor against 1-year HVD (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97; P < .01), whereas prior AVR was associated with higher risk of 1-year HVD (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.26-3.66; P < .01). Five-year cumulative incidence of aortic valve reintervention was significantly higher in HVD vs non-HVD patients (2.3% vs 0.6%, respectively). At 1-year follow-up, the incidence of HVD within the study cohort was 6.2%. Smaller implanted valve size was significantly associated with early HVD. Five-year cumulative incidence of aortic valve reintervention was significantly higher in HVD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashwat et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: