This comparative analysis reveals 18F-FCH PET/CT outperforms contrast-enhanced MRI in detecting brain metastases recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery.
This study aims to evaluate the additional value of [18F]F-fluorocholine ([18F]F-FCH) PET/CT over contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) in detecting the recurrence of brain metastases (BMs) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with lung cancer brain metastases (LCBMs). Thirty-one patients with suspected recurrence of BM in LCBM after SRS were enrolled in this retrospective study. They underwent both [18F]F-FCH PET/CT and CE-MRI within 2 weeks. The tumor imaging parameters and clinical features were analyzed. The results of histopathology or radiographic follow-up served as the reference standard for the final diagnosis. In these 31 patients, there were 54 lesions, of which 27 lesions were proven to be BM recurrence, while 27 lesions were non-recurrence. [18F]F-FCH PET/CT showed high radiotracer uptake in recurrent lesions of BM and identified 24 positive lesions (88.89% of sensitivity), while CE-MRI indicated 23 positive lesions (85.19% of sensitivity). [18F]F-FCH PET/CT indicated higher specificity (81.48%) and accuracy (85.19%) in detecting recurrence of BM than CE-MRI (40.74% and 62.96%, both p < 0.05), particularly in frontal lobes and cerebella. For lesion sizes, the accuracy of [18F]F-FCH PET/CT in detecting recurrent lesions was higher than that of CE-MRI for lesions over 1.0 cm but below 2.0 cm (p = 0.016). The detective performance of [18F]F-FCH PET/CT combined with CE-MRI was higher than [18F]F-FCH PET/CT or CE-MRI alone (all p < 0.05). Interestingly, TLC (≥4.11) was significantly correlated with poor intracranial PFS (iPFS), meaning it was a significant prognostic factor for iPFS. This study identified that compared with CE-MRI, [18F]F-FCH PET/CT demonstrated higher specificity and accuracy in diagnosing recurrence of BM in LCBM after SRS. Combining [18F]F-FCH PET/CT with CE-MRI has the potential to improve diagnostic performance for recurrence of BM and management of patient treatment. TLC was an independent risk factor for iPFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: